why this, now
First contact after 25 days of silence should ask about the person, not demand output. Names the gap plainly without diagnosing a reason for it.
Prycila has gone quiet across every signal: no messages in her 1:1 since roughly 6 Aug (25 days ago), no commits in her own repos for 41 days, and nothing from her on the group project in the 120 days read — no commits to AeonBytes/RocketVideo and no posts in the RocketVideo group chat. Meanwhile the team has been busy around her: 28 commits in the last three weeks from Stelioss4, lizzie992 and the coach, and an active drip-rules PR thread on 26 Aug that she took no part in. Her card has sat on '99 - Group Project' for 89 days and the last coach status note is from Jan 2023, so there is no recent record of what she is actually working on. This is a week-220 client who has fully dropped out of contact rather than someone heads-down.
Edit freely, then copy. pokAI never sends anything — you paste it into WhatsApp yourself.
First contact after 25 days of silence should ask about the person, not demand output. Names the gap plainly without diagnosing a reason for it.
Gives her a real, specific way back in and references what the team actually did on 19–26 Aug. Asks about her part rather than 'how's the project going'.
Week 220 client with a stalled card and no notes since 2023 — a direct, no-judgement ask for a decision is more useful than another soft nudge, and it gives the coach a way to update the record.
What the data does not answer.
Gathered 1 h ago, looking back to 10 Aug 2026.
Read fine, but nobody has said anything inside the window. Last message 25 days ago.
In the project because of the 'Group Project' label on their card. Judged over 30 days, because the project moves slowly — their own work above is judged on the sweep window.
No commits inside the window. Last push 41 days ago.
No time tracking inside the window. Last entry 991 days ago.